First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix

Court of Appeals of Texas

First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix

156 S.W. 535, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 731

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 12, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 S.W. 535 (First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Bank of Wellington v. Hix, 156 S.W. 535, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 731 (Tex. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

HENDRICKS, J.

The motion to affirm and the certificate in this matter show that the appeal bond in the above cause was filed in the lower court on the 16th of March, 1912; hence the appeal was returnable at the preceding' term of this court, and as this motion to affirm, with the certificate of the clerk, was filed at this term of this court, this matter is controlled by the decision in the case of Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S. W. 259, by the Supreme Court, holding that “the appellee, or defendant in error, as the case may be, must file his certificate at the term of the court to which the appeal or writ of error is returnable.”

The motion to affirm on certificate is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENDRICKS, J.

The motion to affirm and the certificate in this matter show that the appeal bond in the above cause was filed in the lower court on the 16th of March, 1912; hence the appeal was returnable at the preceding' term of this court, and as this motion to affirm, with the certificate of the clerk, was filed at this term of this court, this matter is controlled by the decision in the case of Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120, 24 S. W. 259, by the Supreme Court, holding that “the appellee, or defendant in error, as the case may be, must file his certificate at the term of the court to which the appeal or writ of error is returnable.”

The motion to affirm on certificate is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 S.W. 535, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-of-wellington-v-hix-texapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack