FIRST NAT. BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DeMUZIO

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

FIRST NAT. BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DeMUZIO

10 A.3d 901, 608 Pa. 144, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 3010

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 29, 2010·No. 99 WAL 2010·Published

Opinion

*145 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s determination that Petitioner’s counterclaim for breach of contract did not arise from the same transaction that gave rise to Respondent’s claim for mortgage foreclosure and that Petitioner lacked standing to assert the counterclaim?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*145 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s determination that Petitioner’s counterclaim for breach of contract did not arise from the same transaction that gave rise to Respondent’s claim for mortgage foreclosure and that Petitioner lacked standing to assert the counterclaim?

FIRST NAT. BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DeMUZIO, 10 A.3d 901, 608 Pa. 144, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 3010 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

10 A.3d 901 (FIRST NAT. BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DeMUZIO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.