First Nat. Bank of Cushing v. Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

1918 OK 750, 177 P. 547, 71 Okla. 285, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 948
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 31, 1918
Docket9461
StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK 750 (First Nat. Bank of Cushing v. Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First Nat. Bank of Cushing v. Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 1918 OK 750, 177 P. 547, 71 Okla. 285, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 948 (Okla. 1918).

Opinion

PER CURIAM._

This proceeding in error was commenced to review a judgment rendered on the 17th day of February, 1917, and order overruling motion for a new trial made on the 17th day of March, 1917. The defendant in error Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company moves to dismiss the proceeding in error as to it upon the ground *286 that summons in error was not issued and served upon it within the time prescribed by law; they not having waived the issuance and service of same, or entered a general appearance herein.

The motion of said defendant in error appears to be well taken, and the same is sustained. Merritt v. Newton, 67 Okla. 150, 169 Pac. 488. It dees not appear that the At-chison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company is a necessary party to this proceeding in error, and, the'other defendants in error having waived issuance and service of summons in error, jurisdiction is retained as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merriett v. Newton
1917 OK 624 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1918 OK 750, 177 P. 547, 71 Okla. 285, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-of-cushing-v-atchison-t-s-f-ry-co-okla-1918.