First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. Ragsdale

Fifth Circuit

First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. Ragsdale

294 F. 282, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1923

DocketNo. 4032

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 294 F. 282 (First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. Ragsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. Ragsdale, 294 F. 282, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497 (5th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree requiring the appellant to pay over to the trustee in bankruptcy an amount equal to that collected by it upon certain accounts payable to the bankrupt. July 24, 1920, A. L. Jones, by his agent, executed 'to the appellant bank a renewal note for $3,500. August 2, following, an attachment was issued in favor of the South Texas Lumber Company against Jones in a suit to recover $3,666 on open account, and on the next day thereafter Jones’ agent executed an assignment of accounts to the bank as collateral security upon the note above referred to, but dated the assignment the same as the note. August 21 air involuntary petition was filed against Jones, and he was subsequently adjudicated a bankrupt.

It is stipulated that Jones was insolvent on July 24, 1920. The appellant introduced evidence to the effect that the assignment was made in pursuance of a pre-existing oral agreement, in which Jones agreed, more than four months before the petition in bankruptcy was filed, to assign to the bank as collateral accounts which should thereafter become due to him. Jones did not testify, but his agent testified that it had been his custom to attach accounts falling due in the future to notes in favor of the bank as evidence of and as indicating Jones’ financial ability to pay his indebtedness to the bank.

The officers of the bank denied that they had knowledge of Jones’ insolvency at the time the assignment was made; but this evidence was directly contradicted by the representative of the South Texas Lumber Company, who testified that the president of the bank had stated to him that, as soon as the attachment was issued, he required Jones’ agent to assign accounts to secure the note to the bank. It is undisputed that there had been no previous assignments of the accounts.

The assignment was for a past-due indebtedness, and was in fact a preference under section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9644), and voidable as such, although it was executed in pursuance of an oral agreement made more than four months before the filing [284]*284of the petition in bankruptcy. In re Great Western Mfg. Co., 152 Fed. 123, 81 C. C. A. 341; Hayes v. Gibson (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 812, 22 A. L. R. 1372.

If appellant knew, or had reasonable cause to believe, that the enforcement of the assignment would effect a preference, it was voidable by the trustee, who had the authority to recover the value of the property from the appellant. Section 60b of the Bankruptcy Act. We are, of the opinion that the evidence as to the antedating of the assignment, and as to appellant’s knowledge of the issuance of the attachment, is sufficient to support the conclusion, reached by the District Judge, that the appellant had knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that the enforcement of this assignment would effect a preference.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree requiring the appellant to pay over to the trustee in bankruptcy an amount equal to that collected by it upon certain accounts payable to the bankrupt. July 24, 1920, A. L. Jones, by his agent, executed 'to the appellant bank a renewal note for $3,500. August 2, following, an attachment was issued in favor of the South Texas Lumber Company against Jones in a suit to recover $3,666 on open account, and on the next day thereafter Jones’ agent executed an assignment of accounts to the bank as collateral security upon the note above referred to, but dated the assignment the same as the note. August 21 air involuntary petition was filed against Jones, and he was subsequently adjudicated a bankrupt.

It is stipulated that Jones was insolvent on July 24, 1920. The appellant introduced evidence to the effect that the assignment was made in pursuance of a pre-existing oral agreement, in which Jones agreed, more than four months before the petition in bankruptcy was filed, to assign to the bank as collateral accounts which should thereafter become due to him. Jones did not testify, but his agent testified that it had been his custom to attach accounts falling due in the future to notes in favor of the bank as evidence of and as indicating Jones’ financial ability to pay his indebtedness to the bank.

The officers of the bank denied that they had knowledge of Jones’ insolvency at the time the assignment was made; but this evidence was directly contradicted by the representative of the South Texas Lumber Company, who testified that the president of the bank had stated to him that, as soon as the attachment was issued, he required Jones’ agent to assign accounts to secure the note to the bank. It is undisputed that there had been no previous assignments of the accounts.

The assignment was for a past-due indebtedness, and was in fact a preference under section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9644), and voidable as such, although it was executed in pursuance of an oral agreement made more than four months before the filing [284]*284of the petition in bankruptcy. In re Great Western Mfg. Co., 152 Fed. 123, 81 C. C. A. 341; Hayes v. Gibson (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 812, 22 A. L. R. 1372.

If appellant knew, or had reasonable cause to believe, that the enforcement of the assignment would effect a preference, it was voidable by the trustee, who had the authority to recover the value of the property from the appellant. Section 60b of the Bankruptcy Act. We are, of the opinion that the evidence as to the antedating of the assignment, and as to appellant’s knowledge of the issuance of the attachment, is sufficient to support the conclusion, reached by the District Judge, that the appellant had knowledge or reasonable cause to believe that the enforcement of this assignment would effect a preference.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 F. 282, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-of-coleman-v-ragsdale-ca5-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack