First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Whitney

1929 OK 13, 273 P. 1000, 135 Okla. 63, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 58

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 22, 1929

Docket18732

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1929 OK 13 (First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. Whitney, 1929 OK 13, 273 P. 1000, 135 Okla. 63, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 58 (Okla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BEACH, C.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note, and was commenced in the superior court oJ Creek county by the filing of a petition and issuance of summons on July 19, 1922. Eater the case' was transferred to the district court of that county. A trial was had on the issues arising, and a verdict rendered and judgment entered in favo;r of the defendants on December 10, 1924. Motion for new trial was duly filed, which motion was presented and overruled on March 10, 1927. Petition in error with cas'e-made attached was filed in this court on September 16, 1927.

Section 798, O. O. S: 1921, provides the proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgment or final order shall be. commenced in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order.

“Where petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the final judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter, and the appeal will b'e dismissed.” Gilmore v. Smith et al., 93 Okla. 4, 219 Pac. 92; Verschoyle v. McDaniels et al., 127 Okla. 166, 260 Pac. 55; Jones v. Blanton, 130 Okla. 200, 266 Pac. 438; In re Guardianship of Butler, Butler v. Archard, Gdn., 130 Okla. 241, 266 Pac. 1106.

“The filing of a petition in error depends upon the terms of statute authorizing it, and will not become operative until the requisites! are first complied with, and if a fee is made a necessary coincident thereto, no filing is accomplished or effected without the payment of such fe'e.

“Where a proceeding in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, it will be. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” Converse et al. v. Berry, 131 Okla. 188, 268 Pac. 235.

Since petition in error in this action was not filed in this court until more than six months after the date of the judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the action, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

BENNETT, REID, FOSTER, and HERR, Commissioners, concur.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. §1074, p. 1067, n. 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEACH, C.

This is an action to recover on a promissory note, and was commenced in the superior court oJ Creek county by the filing of a petition and issuance of summons on July 19, 1922. Eater the case' was transferred to the district court of that county. A trial was had on the issues arising, and a verdict rendered and judgment entered in favo;r of the defendants on December 10, 1924. Motion for new trial was duly filed, which motion was presented and overruled on March 10, 1927. Petition in error with cas'e-made attached was filed in this court on September 16, 1927.

Section 798, O. O. S: 1921, provides the proceedings for reversing, vacating, or modifying judgment or final order shall be. commenced in this court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order.

“Where petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the final judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter, and the appeal will b'e dismissed.” Gilmore v. Smith et al., 93 Okla. 4, 219 Pac. 92; Verschoyle v. McDaniels et al., 127 Okla. 166, 260 Pac. 55; Jones v. Blanton, 130 Okla. 200, 266 Pac. 438; In re Guardianship of Butler, Butler v. Archard, Gdn., 130 Okla. 241, 266 Pac. 1106.

“The filing of a petition in error depends upon the terms of statute authorizing it, and will not become operative until the requisites! are first complied with, and if a fee is made a necessary coincident thereto, no filing is accomplished or effected without the payment of such fe'e.

“Where a proceeding in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, it will be. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” Converse et al. v. Berry, 131 Okla. 188, 268 Pac. 235.

Since petition in error in this action was not filed in this court until more than six months after the date of the judgment complained of, this court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the action, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

BENNETT, REID, FOSTER, and HERR, Commissioners, concur.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Note. — See “Appeal and Error,” 3 C. J. §1074, p. 1067, n. 28.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK 13, 273 P. 1000, 135 Okla. 63, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-of-bristow-v-whitney-okla-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack