First Nat. Bank in Orlando v. Roberts
109 So. 635, 92 Fla. 18
Opinions
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First Nat. Bank in Orlando v. Roberts, 109 So. 635, 92 Fla. 18 (Fla. 1926).
109 So. 635 (First Nat. Bank in Orlando v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vila v. State
74 So. 3d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Cruz v. Plasencia
778 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Gallagher v. Federal Ins. Co.
346 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Boykin v. State
257 So. 2d 251 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Florida Power & Light Company v. McCollum
140 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Tampa Electric Co. v. Jandreau
112 So. 558 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)