First Manhattan Realty Co. v. Rettner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First Manhattan Realty Co. v. Rettner

20 A.D.2d 693, 247 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4412

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 693 (First Manhattan Realty Co. v. Rettner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Manhattan Realty Co. v. Rettner, 20 A.D.2d 693, 247 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4412 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order entered May [694]*69420, 1963, granting a motion made by a receiver of real estate to adjudge respondents-appellants guilty of contempt of court, imposing a fine therefore and making provision for respondents-appellants purging themselves of contempt by paying over all moneys they had collected subsequent to the appointment of the receiver, is dismissed, without costs, on the facts and the law, and in the exercise of discretion. In his brief the receiver acknowledges that $874.50 was paid to him “ and accepted by him as full compliance with the contempt order.” Respondents-appellants, in their brief, also assert they have paid $875 to the receiver; and state they paid the fine in the amount of $250, despite the fact that the order provided they might purge themselves by paying all moneys collected after the appointment of the receiver. Concur — Botein, P. J., Tálente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order entered May [694]*69420, 1963, granting a motion made by a receiver of real estate to adjudge respondents-appellants guilty of contempt of court, imposing a fine therefore and making provision for respondents-appellants purging themselves of contempt by paying over all moneys they had collected subsequent to the appointment of the receiver, is dismissed, without costs, on the facts and the law, and in the exercise of discretion. In his brief the receiver acknowledges that $874.50 was paid to him “ and accepted by him as full compliance with the contempt order.” Respondents-appellants, in their brief, also assert they have paid $875 to the receiver; and state they paid the fine in the amount of $250, despite the fact that the order provided they might purge themselves by paying all moneys collected after the appointment of the receiver. Concur — Botein, P. J., Tálente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 693, 247 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-manhattan-realty-co-v-rettner-nyappdiv-1964.