First Industrial Loan Co. v. Rosenhand

Supreme Court of New Jersey

First Industrial Loan Co. v. Rosenhand

179 A. 309, 115 N.J.L. 252, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 306

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 24, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Where a co-maker places his signature upon a note at a place other than the place where a small loan business is being conducted that circumstance does not void the instrument under chapter 62 of Pamph. L. 1932. N. J. Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, § 35-22.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Where a co-maker places his signature upon a note at a place other than the place where a small loan business is being conducted that circumstance does not void the instrument under chapter 62 of Pamph. L. 1932. N. J. Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, § 35-22.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

First Industrial Loan Co. v. Rosenhand, 179 A. 309, 115 N.J.L. 252, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 306 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

179 A. 309 (First Industrial Loan Co. v. Rosenhand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related