First Horizon Home Loans v. White
This text of 2011 Ohio 1982 (First Horizon Home Loans v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as First Horizon Home Loans v. White, 2011-Ohio-1982.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY
FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS, A : DIVISION OF FIRST TENNESSEE : Appellate Case No. 24244 BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION : SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO FIRST : Trial Court Case No. 2010-CV-04513 HORIZON HOME LOAN : CORPORATION : : Plaintiff-Appellee : (Civil Appeal from : (Common Pleas Court) v. : : TERESA D. WHITE, et al. : : Defendant-Appellant : : ...........
OPINION
Rendered on the 22nd day of April, 2011.
...........
ELIZABETH S. FULLER, Atty. Reg. #0081032, Lerner, Sampson & Rothfuss, LPA, 120 East Fourth Street, 8th Floor, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee
TERESA D. WHITE, 1742 Suman Avenue, Dayton, Ohio 45403 Defendant-Appellant, pro se
.............
BROGAN, J.
{¶ 1} Teresa White appeals from the judgment of the Montgomery County Common
Pleas Court in favor of First Horizon Home Loans (hereinafter “First Horizon”). 2
{¶ 2} In June 2010, First Horizon filed a complaint in foreclosure alleging that White
had defaulted in the payment of a promissory note which she executed on March 17, 2004 in
the amount of $45,400 to First Horizon. First Horizon alleged White was in default for
non-payment as of December 1, 2009, and in accordance with the terms of the note she owed
First Horizon $41,645.63 together with interest due thereon.
{¶ 3} The complaint alleged that White was immune from personal liability on the
note by virtue of her taking bankruptcy. The plaintiff alleged in a separate count that White
executed a mortgage on the real estate located at 1742 Suman Avenue to secure the
promissory note and that it was the first lien holder upon the real estate. First Horizon named
a John Doe defendant as current spouse of White in the event she was presently married. The
plaintiff also named as defendants the State of Ohio Department of Taxation and Greenville
National Bank who allegedly had recorded judgment liens against White.
{¶ 4} In its prayer for relief, First Horizon requested that the court adjudge it as first
lien holder on the subject property, that the mortgage be foreclosed and the property sold so it
could be paid the amount due from White. The plaintiff was not seeking a personal judgment
against White for any deficiency that might result from the sale of the property.
{¶ 5} On June 28, 2010, White moved the court to extend the time for answer. She
requested 28 additional days to answer because she said she was seeking an attorney to assist
her in contesting the foreclosure. On July 1, 2010, the trial court granted White an additional
30 days to answer the complaint.
{¶ 6} On July 19, 2010, the Department of Taxation answered the complaint and
disclaimed any interest in the litigation. When neither Greenville National Bank nor White 3
answered the complaint in a timely manner, First Horizon moved on August 2, 2010 for a
default judgment. Counsel for First Horizon certified that she served White and the
Greenville Bank with the motion.
{¶ 7} On August 9, 2011, the trial court granted First Horizon’s default motion. The
court found that White was in default for failing to answer the complaint, and no service was
obtained on the alleged John Doe. The court found the allegations in the complaint to be true
and ordered that the interest of the defendants in the property be foreclosed and the real estate
sold.
{¶ 8} On September 1, 2010, White appealed the judgment entered by the trial court.
In her appellate brief, Ms. White contends the trial court’s judgment should be overturned
because the plaintiff’s complaint included a John Doe defendant alleged to be her husband.
She states that she has never married. Also, she argues that she does not owe the
Department of Taxation any money and the judgment lien mentioned in the complaint is for
Teresa A. White, not Theresa D. White. Lastly, she alleges in her brief that she entered into
an agreement on July 19, 2010 with First Horizon to begin a repayment plan for the amount in
arrears on the note. She alleges that this agreement was to have ended the foreclosure
proceedings. She included a copy of the agreement and a copy of the cashier’s check sent to
First Horizon.
{¶ 9} For its part First Horizon argues that White was not prejudiced by the naming
of a John Doe defendant and the Ohio Department of Taxation. We agree. The John Doe
defendant was named in the event White was married so that her husband’s (if she was
married) dower interest could be foreclosed in the litigation. See Huntington Nat’l Bank v. 4
Ross (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 687. The Department of Taxation answered and disclaimed
any interest in the legal proceedings.
{¶ 10} First Horizon argues that the trial court properly granted its default motion
because the alleged Forbearance Agreement was unexecuted and was not presented to the trial
court before the default judgment was entered.
{¶ 11} We agree with appellee that we may only consider what was presented to the
trial court. It is the actions of the trial court we are reviewing. If First Horizon agreed to
forbear pursuing the foreclosure action upon receipt of a signed agreement and two-thousand
dollars from White, she may be entitled to relief under Civ.R. 60(B). If White did not answer
the complaint because of the alleged agreement, this may be excusable neglect under the Rule.
Ms. White, of course, would still have to demonstrate she has a meritorious defense to the
foreclosure action to present. Antonopoulos v. Eisner (1972), 30 Ohio App.2d 187.
{¶ 12} However, based on the record before us the appellant’s assignments of error
have no merit. The judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.
GRADY, P.J., and FROELICH, J., concur
(Hon. James A. Brogan, retired from the Second District Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio).
Copies mailed to:
Elizabeth S. Fuller Teresa D. White Hon. Gregory F. Singer 5
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-horizon-home-loans-v-white-ohioctapp-2011.