First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit v. William David Lustig, First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lenawee County v. Patricia K. Fischer

702 F.2d 92, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30237
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 1983
Docket80-1754
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 702 F.2d 92 (First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit v. William David Lustig, First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lenawee County v. Patricia K. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit v. William David Lustig, First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lenawee County v. Patricia K. Fischer, 702 F.2d 92, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30237 (1st Cir. 1983).

Opinion

702 F.2d 92

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DETROIT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William David LUSTIG, et al., Defendants-Appellees
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF LENAWEE COUNTY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patricia K. FISCHER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 80-1754, 80-1748.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 23, 1983.

Roger K. Timm, Joanne R. Lax, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.

Harvey A. Koselka, Adrian, Mich., for defendants-appellees in No. 80-1748.

Paul A. Longton, Wyandotte, Mich., for defendants-appellees in No. 80-1754.

Before WEICK and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judges, and PORTER, Senior District Judge.*

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO REHEAR

On receipt and consideration of a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc in the above styled cases; and

No judge in active service in this court having moved for rehearing en banc and the motion therefore having been referred to the panel which heard the case; and

The panel having noted nothing of substance in said motion for rehearing which had not been carefully considered before issuance of the court's opinion.

Now, therefore, it is ORDERED that the motion for rehearing be and the same is hereby denied.

Judge Weick dissents from this order denying the petition to rehear and would grant the petition for the reasons set out in his dissent from the per curiam opinion entered in this case. 687 F.2d 143 (6th Cir.1982).

*

The Honorable David S. Porter, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pena v. Downey Savings & Loan, Ass'n
929 F. Supp. 1308 (C.D. California, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 F.2d 92, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-federal-savings-loan-association-of-detroit-v-william-david-ca1-1983.