First Coinvestors, Inc. v. Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First Coinvestors, Inc. v. Kaufman

53 A.D.2d 636, 385 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 636 (First Coinvestors, Inc. v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Coinvestors, Inc. v. Kaufman, 53 A.D.2d 636, 385 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action inter alia to permanently enjoin the defendants from using plaintiff’s customer lists and for an accounting, (1) plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 19, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of defendants and against it and (2) defendants Kaufman and Feldman cross-appeal from so much of the said judgment as dismissed their counterclaim against the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts herein, Special Term was warranted in reaching the conclusion that it did. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action inter alia to permanently enjoin the defendants from using plaintiff’s customer lists and for an accounting, (1) plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 19, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of defendants and against it and (2) defendants Kaufman and Feldman cross-appeal from so much of the said judgment as dismissed their counterclaim against the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts herein, Special Term was warranted in reaching the conclusion that it did. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 636, 385 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-coinvestors-inc-v-kaufman-nyappdiv-1976.