FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. v. Scofield

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. v. Scofield

335 S.E.2d 248, 286 S.C. 520, 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 453

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 23, 1985

Docket0552

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 335 S.E.2d 248 (FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. v. Scofield, 335 S.E.2d 248, 286 S.C. 520, 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 453 (S.C. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Judge:

First Citizens Bank commenced this action to set aside a voluntary conveyance from Joe W. Scofield, Jr., to his mother, Venita McCue Scofield. The Bank alleged the conveyance was to prevent it from collecting a judgment against Scofield for an unpaid indebtedness. The circuit court entered a decree setting aside the conveyance. The Scofields appeal. We affirm.

In January 1977, Scofield executed a promissory note to the Bank to cover certain business indebtedness. The note was renewed in January 1978. Scofield defaulted on the note in June 1979.

In August 1978, prior to his default on the note, Scofield conveyed his residence in Mount Pleasant to his mother. The mother paid nothing for the property. After the conveyance, Scofield continued to reside on the property and to pay the mortgage and taxes on it. He pays no rent to his mother. The mother continues to reside at her own home on James Island. She testified she knew nothing about the conveyance until it was completed.

*522 The Bank obtained a judgment on the note in May 1980. In August 1980 an execution was returned nulla bona by the sheriff of Charleston County. Thereafter the Bank commenced this action to have the conveyance set aside.

We hold the conveyance from Scofield to his mother was void under the Statute of Elizabeth, now codified as Section 27-23-10, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. One who is in debt cannot make a voluntary conveyance which will prevail against existing debts. Cordery v. Zealy, 18 S.C.L. (2 Bail.) 97 (1831); Richardson v. Rhodus, 48 S.C.L. (14 Rich.) 30 (1866). If the debt was in existence at the time of the conveyance, it is immaterial that it had not yet been reduced to judgment. Matthews v. Montgomery, 193 S. C. 118, 7 S. E. (2d) 841 (1940). A voluntary conveyance which has the effect of defeating the rights of existing creditors is not saved from the operation of the statute by reciting a consideration of five dollars and “love and affection.” See Farmers’ Bank v. Bradham, 129 S. C. 270, 123 S. E. 835 (1924); Coleman v. Daniel, 261 S. C. 198, 199 S. E. (2d) 74 (1973).

The decree of the circuit court is

Affirmed.

Sanders, C.J., and Shaw, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Judge:

First Citizens Bank commenced this action to set aside a voluntary conveyance from Joe W. Scofield, Jr., to his mother, Venita McCue Scofield. The Bank alleged the conveyance was to prevent it from collecting a judgment against Scofield for an unpaid indebtedness. The circuit court entered a decree setting aside the conveyance. The Scofields appeal. We affirm.

In January 1977, Scofield executed a promissory note to the Bank to cover certain business indebtedness. The note was renewed in January 1978. Scofield defaulted on the note in June 1979.

In August 1978, prior to his default on the note, Scofield conveyed his residence in Mount Pleasant to his mother. The mother paid nothing for the property. After the conveyance, Scofield continued to reside on the property and to pay the mortgage and taxes on it. He pays no rent to his mother. The mother continues to reside at her own home on James Island. She testified she knew nothing about the conveyance until it was completed.

*522 The Bank obtained a judgment on the note in May 1980. In August 1980 an execution was returned nulla bona by the sheriff of Charleston County. Thereafter the Bank commenced this action to have the conveyance set aside.

We hold the conveyance from Scofield to his mother was void under the Statute of Elizabeth, now codified as Section 27-23-10, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. One who is in debt cannot make a voluntary conveyance which will prevail against existing debts. Cordery v. Zealy, 18 S.C.L. (2 Bail.) 97 (1831); Richardson v. Rhodus, 48 S.C.L. (14 Rich.) 30 (1866). If the debt was in existence at the time of the conveyance, it is immaterial that it had not yet been reduced to judgment. Matthews v. Montgomery, 193 S. C. 118, 7 S. E. (2d) 841 (1940). A voluntary conveyance which has the effect of defeating the rights of existing creditors is not saved from the operation of the statute by reciting a consideration of five dollars and “love and affection.” See Farmers’ Bank v. Bradham, 129 S. C. 270, 123 S. E. 835 (1924); Coleman v. Daniel, 261 S. C. 198, 199 S. E. (2d) 74 (1973).

The decree of the circuit court is

Affirmed.

Sanders, C.J., and Shaw, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

335 S.E.2d 248, 286 S.C. 520, 1985 S.C. App. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-citizens-bank-trust-co-v-scofield-scctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack