First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.

246 A.D. 672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On the appeal appellant Johnson is reviewing an order of the court at Special Term surcharging his accounts to the extent of $7,623.72, as receiver of the mortgaged properties involved in these actions. He is also seeking to review two other orders denying him the same relief. He has also appealed from a second order denying his application for leave to intervene as a defendant or as amicus curios in those actions. A former order of the Special Term denying a like application was affirmed by this court (243 App. Div. 843). The proof amply sustains the order of surcharge. Appellant should not be permitted to intervene in these actions in any capacity. Orders unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp., 246 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 672 (First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rochdale Village Inc. v. Harris
172 Misc. 2d 758 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)