First Chrold Corp. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court

First Chrold Corp. v. Commissioner

306 U.S. 117, 59 S. Ct. 427, 83 L. Ed. 542, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1173, 1 C.B. 228, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 276

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 30, 1939

Docket385

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 306 U.S. 117 (First Chrold Corp. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Chrold Corp. v. Commissioner, 306 U.S. 117, 59 S. Ct. 427, 83 L. Ed. 542, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1173, 1 C.B. 228, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 276 (1939).

Pincite

Opinion

*118 Mb. Justice RobeRTS

delivered the opinion of the Court. ■

This case presents the same question as that involved in No. 328, Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., ante, p. 110. Certiorari was granted because of a conflict in the decisions below. . The statutory provision under which this case arises is § 22 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, which is the same as the .corresponding section of the Revenue Act of 1928. The regulations, original and amended, have the same relation to this controversy as to that in No. 328. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained a determination of a deficiency in the petitioner’s tax for the calendar year 1933 and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirm'ed the Board’s ruling. 1

For the reasons given in No. 328 the judgment must be

Reversed.

1

97 F. 2d 22.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*118 Mb. Justice RobeRTS

delivered the opinion of the Court. ■

This case presents the same question as that involved in No. 328, Helvering v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., ante, p. 110. Certiorari was granted because of a conflict in the decisions below. . The statutory provision under which this case arises is § 22 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, which is the same as the .corresponding section of the Revenue Act of 1928. The regulations, original and amended, have the same relation to this controversy as to that in No. 328. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained a determination of a deficiency in the petitioner’s tax for the calendar year 1933 and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirm'ed the Board’s ruling. 1

For the reasons given in No. 328 the judgment must be

Reversed.

1

97 F. 2d 22.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 U.S. 117, 59 S. Ct. 427, 83 L. Ed. 542, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1173, 1 C.B. 228, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-chrold-corp-v-commissioner-scotus-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack