First Christian Church of Fresno v. Indus. Accident Comm'n

California Supreme Court

First Christian Church of Fresno v. Indus. Accident Comm'n

160 P. 675, 173 Cal. 552, 1916 Cal. LEXIS 443

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 17, 1916

DocketS. F. No. 7685.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 160 P. 675 (First Christian Church of Fresno v. Indus. Accident Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Christian Church of Fresno v. Indus. Accident Comm'n, 160 P. 675, 173 Cal. 552, 1916 Cal. LEXIS 443 (Cal. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

*553 MELVIN, J.

Certiorari directed to the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California for the purpose of. reviewing an award in favor of one Augustus Cohnhoff and against the petitioner to this court, First Christian Church of Fresno.

Cohnhoff had been employed by a subcontractor, the Thomas & Schneider Art Glass Company, and counsel for the church denied liability of their client for that reason. They also contended that no legal notice of the hearing before the Industrial Accident Commission had ever been served upon any accredited representative of the church until after the testimony had been taken. After the issuance of the writ the cases of Carstens v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 572, [158 Pac. 218], and Sturdivant v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 581, [158 Pac. 222], were decided. Thereafter counsel for respondent filed a memorandum in which he recited that as the decisions in said cases determined and ruled all questions raised in this proceeding adversely to respondent’s contentions, he waived further time for filing briefs, and agreed that the award made against petitioner should be annulled so far as the Industrial Accident Commission was concerned. He properly declined to make any waiver on behalf of Augustus Cohnhoff, who was represented here by his own counsel. No brief has been filed by Cohnhoff or his counsel, probably for the reason that .there is no possible way of differentiating the facts involved in this proceeding from those considered by the court in the decisions cited above. We have examined the record and fully agree with learned counsel for the Industrial Accident Commission that those decisions “determined and ruled all questions raised and involved in the instant case.’’

Therefore the award is annulled.

Shaw, J., Sloss, J., Henshaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*553 MELVIN, J.

Certiorari directed to the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California for the purpose of. reviewing an award in favor of one Augustus Cohnhoff and against the petitioner to this court, First Christian Church of Fresno.

Cohnhoff had been employed by a subcontractor, the Thomas & Schneider Art Glass Company, and counsel for the church denied liability of their client for that reason. They also contended that no legal notice of the hearing before the Industrial Accident Commission had ever been served upon any accredited representative of the church until after the testimony had been taken. After the issuance of the writ the cases of Carstens v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 572, [158 Pac. 218], and Sturdivant v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 581, [158 Pac. 222], were decided. Thereafter counsel for respondent filed a memorandum in which he recited that as the decisions in said cases determined and ruled all questions raised in this proceeding adversely to respondent’s contentions, he waived further time for filing briefs, and agreed that the award made against petitioner should be annulled so far as the Industrial Accident Commission was concerned. He properly declined to make any waiver on behalf of Augustus Cohnhoff, who was represented here by his own counsel. No brief has been filed by Cohnhoff or his counsel, probably for the reason that .there is no possible way of differentiating the facts involved in this proceeding from those considered by the court in the decisions cited above. We have examined the record and fully agree with learned counsel for the Industrial Accident Commission that those decisions “determined and ruled all questions raised and involved in the instant case.’’

Therefore the award is annulled.

Shaw, J., Sloss, J., Henshaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 P. 675, 173 Cal. 552, 1916 Cal. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-christian-church-of-fresno-v-indus-accident-commn-cal-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack