First Baptist Society v. City of Fall River
Opinion
The jury were directed by the sheriff to add interest, from the time of the taking of the land, upon the amount of damages found by them to have been thereby occasioned to the petitioner’s estate, and to return the amount of damages and interest in one sum ; and they must be presumed to have followed that direction. It thus appears that their verdict included interest, and that, making due allowance for the interest so included, the damages awarded by the mayor and aldermen were not increased by the jury. The petitioner is therefore not entitled to costs. Gen. St. c. 43, § 73. Kidder v. Oxford, 116 Mass. 165.
Taxation affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
119 Mass. 95 (First Baptist Society v. City of Fall River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.