First Bank v. Lindenwood Care Corp.

414 S.W.3d 520, 2013 WL 4578110, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 983
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 27, 2013·No. No. ED 99218·Published

Opinion

[521] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lindenwood Care Corporation; Jamie-son Realty, L.L.C.; Trinity Capital Associates, L.L.C.; S & C Investment Group, L.L.C., and Surendra Chaganti, M.D., appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of First Bank on Counts I, II and IV of First Bank’s Petition seeking payment for amounts due under a promissory note and guarantees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First Bank v. Lindenwood Care Corp., 414 S.W.3d 520, 2013 WL 4578110, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 983 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

414 S.W.3d 520 (First Bank v. Lindenwood Care Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.