First Bank v. Annie-Joyce Group, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

First Bank v. Annie-Joyce Group, LLC

367 S.W.3d 649, 2012 WL 1995082, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 750

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. ED 97332·Published

Opinion

[650] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a pro se appeal from that part of a judgment denying appellant’s motion to quash garnishment. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[650] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a pro se appeal from that part of a judgment denying appellant’s motion to quash garnishment. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

First Bank v. Annie-Joyce Group, LLC, 367 S.W.3d 649, 2012 WL 1995082, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 750 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 649 (First Bank v. Annie-Joyce Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related