First American Title v. Christopher Lett etc

1 F. App'x 599
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2001
Docket00-1707
StatusUnpublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 F. App'x 599 (First American Title v. Christopher Lett etc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First American Title v. Christopher Lett etc, 1 F. App'x 599 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Spouses Christopher Kevin Lett and Patricia Lynn Lett bought real estate in Missouri and a mobile home to place there. The land was financed by a deed of trust *600 to a bank and the mobile home was financed by Green Tree Financial Servicing. The Letts later sold half of the land and, by mistake, the bank released its security interest for the entire property. After construction and improvements, the mobile home became a permanent structure on the land contrary to the Letts’ agreement with Green Tree, and when the Letts sold the remaining land with the home, Green Tree’s security interest in the mobile home was not discovered on the land records. Two days after First American Title Insurance Company filed a complaint against the Letts, the Letts filed a petition in bankruptcy. First American and Green Tree filed adversary proceedings seeking an exception from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) (money or property obtained by false pretenses, false representation, or actual fraud) and 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) (willful or malicious conversion of another’s property without their knowledge or consent). The bankruptcy court held the Letts’ debt to First American was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A) and the Letts’ debts to First American and Green Tree were nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6). See In re Lett, 238 B.R. 167 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Mo.1999). The bankruptcy court also imposed a constructive trust on the Letts’ Kansas real estate, which the Letts had purchased with the ill-gotten proceeds from the sale of their Missouri property, and denied the Letts a discharge under § 727(a)(2)(A). See id. The district court affirmed. On appeal, the Letts assert a shotgun array of issues. Having considered them all, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s thorough, twenty-seven page order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Okorie v. Lentz
Fifth Circuit, 2025
In Re Gonzalez
456 B.R. 429 (C.D. California, 2011)
In Re Marketxt Holdings, Corp.
428 B.R. 579 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Chimera Capital, L.P. v. Nisselson
428 B.R. 579 (S.D. New York, 2010)
In Re McGinnis
306 B.R. 279 (W.D. Missouri, 2004)
Will v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Will)
303 B.R. 357 (N.D. Illinois, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. App'x 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-american-title-v-christopher-lett-etc-ca8-2001.