First American Bank of North Little Rock, NA v. Associated Hosts, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

First American Bank of North Little Rock, NA v. Associated Hosts, Inc.

730 S.W.2d 496, 292 Ark. 445, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2148

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 15, 1987

Docket87-6

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 730 S.W.2d 496 (First American Bank of North Little Rock, NA v. Associated Hosts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First American Bank of North Little Rock, NA v. Associated Hosts, Inc., 730 S.W.2d 496, 292 Ark. 445, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2148 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

John I. Purtle, Justice.

This appeal represents yet another attack on the lack of a Dramshop Act in Arkansas, and as such, it too must fail.

On December 7, 1982, the appellant attended the “happy hour” at a local bar and dance hall where he consumed more than a dozen drinks in about three hours. The appellant left the bar in an intoxicated condition and fell backwards on the sidewalk. The appellant’s head struck the pavement, and he sustained injuries which rendered him partially paralyzed, blind in one eye, and mildly retarded.

The question presented is whether a dramshop owner or operator is liable for damages to a patron who becomes intoxicated and by reason thereof sustains injury. Our prior decisions hold that an owner of a tavern is not responsible for injuries caused to third parties by a drunk patron. See Yancey v. The Beverage House of Little Rock, Inc., 291 Ark. 217, 723 S.W.2d 826 (1987). We hold that there is no reason to favor an intoxicated patron over an innocent third party. At the common law, a tavern owner had no liability for injury to a patron or a third party. See Bolen v. Still, 123 Ark. 308, 185 S.W. 811 (1916).

We continue to defer to the General Assembly on this subject. Yancey, supra. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court in dismissing the complaint.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John I. Purtle, Justice.

This appeal represents yet another attack on the lack of a Dramshop Act in Arkansas, and as such, it too must fail.

On December 7, 1982, the appellant attended the “happy hour” at a local bar and dance hall where he consumed more than a dozen drinks in about three hours. The appellant left the bar in an intoxicated condition and fell backwards on the sidewalk. The appellant’s head struck the pavement, and he sustained injuries which rendered him partially paralyzed, blind in one eye, and mildly retarded.

The question presented is whether a dramshop owner or operator is liable for damages to a patron who becomes intoxicated and by reason thereof sustains injury. Our prior decisions hold that an owner of a tavern is not responsible for injuries caused to third parties by a drunk patron. See Yancey v. The Beverage House of Little Rock, Inc., 291 Ark. 217, 723 S.W.2d 826 (1987). We hold that there is no reason to favor an intoxicated patron over an innocent third party. At the common law, a tavern owner had no liability for injury to a patron or a third party. See Bolen v. Still, 123 Ark. 308, 185 S.W. 811 (1916).

We continue to defer to the General Assembly on this subject. Yancey, supra. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court in dismissing the complaint.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

730 S.W.2d 496, 292 Ark. 445, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-american-bank-of-north-little-rock-na-v-associated-hosts-inc-ark-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack