First & 91 LLC v. 1765 First Associates LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First & 91 LLC v. 1765 First Associates LLC

73 A.D.3d 663, 900 N.Y.S.2d 870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.3d 663 (First & 91 LLC v. 1765 First Associates LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First & 91 LLC v. 1765 First Associates LLC, 73 A.D.3d 663, 900 N.Y.S.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered April 9, 2009, which, to the extent appealed as limited by the briefs, denied defendant New York Crane’s motion to consolidate all pending and any future-filed actions arising out of the May 30, 2008 collapse of a crane, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

According deference to the exercise of discretion by the trial [664]*664court (see Geneva Temps, Inc. v New World Communities, Inc., 24 AD3d 332, 334 [2005]), and recognizing the administrative order, issued after New York Crane had made this motion, we agree with the Supreme Court that consolidation at this point is premature. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 23 Misc 3d 1108(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 50639(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Matthew F. Cooper, J.), entered April 9, 2009, which, to the extent appealed as limited by the briefs, denied defendant New York Crane’s motion to consolidate all pending and any future-filed actions arising out of the May 30, 2008 collapse of a crane, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

According deference to the exercise of discretion by the trial [664]*664court (see Geneva Temps, Inc. v New World Communities, Inc., 24 AD3d 332, 334 [2005]), and recognizing the administrative order, issued after New York Crane had made this motion, we agree with the Supreme Court that consolidation at this point is premature. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 23 Misc 3d 1108(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 50639(11).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.3d 663, 900 N.Y.S.2d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-91-llc-v-1765-first-associates-llc-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack