Firn v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
This text of 725 So. 2d 1177 (Firn v. Ohio Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal, James and Mildred Firn challenge the trial court’s determination that James Firn is not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage. The relevant facts underlying the trial court’s final judgment are set forth in its order granting the motion for [1178]*1178summary judgment filed by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that under the terms of the insurance policy at issue in this case, James Firn was not an insured for basic liability coverage and is, therefore, not entitled to uninsured motorist coverage. Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
725 So. 2d 1177, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15899, 1998 WL 879128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firn-v-ohio-casualty-insurance-fladistctapp-1998.