Firkus v. Alder Creek Lumber Co.

617 P.2d 625, 48 Or. App. 234
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 22, 1980
DocketNos. 78-386 & 78-10,304, CA 16396
StatusPublished

This text of 617 P.2d 625 (Firkus v. Alder Creek Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Firkus v. Alder Creek Lumber Co., 617 P.2d 625, 48 Or. App. 234 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Firkus v. Alder Creek Lumber, 48 Or App 251, 617 P2d 620 (1980), in which we held that Alder Creek Lumber Company and its carrier EBI Companies, and not the Vocational Rehabilitation Division and its carrier SAIF, are responsible for claimant’s industrial injury. Hence, the award of compensation to be paid by SAIF in this action is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Firkus v. Alder Creek Lumber
617 P.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 P.2d 625, 48 Or. App. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firkus-v-alder-creek-lumber-co-orctapp-1980.