Firestone v. Firestone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Firestone v. Firestone

302 So. 2d 494

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1974·No. No. 74-1063·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who is the former husband of the appellee, appeals an order allowing attorney’s fees to the appellee in a dissolution of marriage action. The main thrust of appellant’s appeal is that the fee is so excessive that it should shock the judicial conscience of this court. We find that no error has been presented on this point under the law as set forth in Bosem v. Bosem, Fla.1973, 279 So.2d 863.

The remaining points urged by appellant have been considered and found not to present reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who is the former husband of the appellee, appeals an order allowing attorney’s fees to the appellee in a dissolution of marriage action. The main thrust of appellant’s appeal is that the fee is so excessive that it should shock the judicial conscience of this court. We find that no error has been presented on this point under the law as set forth in Bosem v. Bosem, Fla.1973, 279 So.2d 863.

The remaining points urged by appellant have been considered and found not to present reversible error.

Affirmed.

Firestone v. Firestone, 302 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

302 So. 2d 494 (Firestone v. Firestone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related