Firestone Tire & Rubber v. Knowles

561 So. 2d 1293, 1990 WL 71622
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 24, 1990
Docket89-2659
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 1293 (Firestone Tire & Rubber v. Knowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Firestone Tire & Rubber v. Knowles, 561 So. 2d 1293, 1990 WL 71622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

561 So.2d 1293 (1990)

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER and Cigna Ins. Company, Appellants,
v.
George KNOWLES and the Division of Workers' Compensation, Appellees.

No. 89-2659.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 24, 1990.

Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, for appellants.

Jerold Feuer, Miami, for appellees.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

The employer/carrier seek review of a workers' compensation order by which attendant care for 24 hours per day was awarded to claimant. We affirm, finding competent, substantial evidence to support the award of around-the-clock daily care, and finding no error in the amount which was awarded for the per hour value of that care. However, we reverse that part of the order which compensates claimant's wife for providing such attendant care for more than 12 hours per day after October 1, 1989. According to Mr. C's TV Rental v. Murray, 559 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA April 12, 1990), section 440.13(2)(e)2, Florida Statutes, as it was amended effective October 1, 1989, applies to attendant care benefits awarded in a preamendment order where services are both rendered and paid for after the effective date of the amendment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for compliance with section 440.13(2)(e)2, Florida Statutes (1989).

SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Bell Telephone, Inc. v. Cordell
693 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Collura v. Multi Line Can Co.
598 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Allied Discount Tires v. Cook
587 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Burris v. Goodyear
577 So. 2d 1376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. v. Faircloth
577 So. 2d 1382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Florida Refreshment & General Adjustment Bureau v. Whaley
577 So. 2d 1368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Smith v. DRW Realty Services
569 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 1293, 1990 WL 71622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-v-knowles-fladistctapp-1990.