Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. State Conservation Commission

West Virginia Court of Claims

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. State Conservation Commission

2 Ct. Cl. 173

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJuly 30, 1943

DocketNo. 280

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ct. Cl. 173 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. State Conservation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. State Conservation Commission, 2 Ct. Cl. 173 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

G. H. A. KUNST, Judge.

Claimant asks for an award of the sum of $43.31 in payment for five tires and two tubes shipped to said respondent from claimant’s store in Charleston, West Virginia, upon regular purchase orders nos. sp 1264 and sp 1430, which were delivered to said store on August 27, 1940 and January 15, 1941 respectively. Statement for said tires and tubes was not received by said respondent until in May 1943, at which time the excess of its biennial appropriation for the biennium ending June 30, 1941 had reverted to the general revenue fund and consequently there were no funds legally available for its payment.

Evidence proving this claim having been presented to the court, and allowance of the award recommended by respondent, and approved by the attorney general, an award is accordingly made to respondent for the sum of forty-three dollars and thirty-one cents ($43.31).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. H. A. KUNST, Judge.

Claimant asks for an award of the sum of $43.31 in payment for five tires and two tubes shipped to said respondent from claimant’s store in Charleston, West Virginia, upon regular purchase orders nos. sp 1264 and sp 1430, which were delivered to said store on August 27, 1940 and January 15, 1941 respectively. Statement for said tires and tubes was not received by said respondent until in May 1943, at which time the excess of its biennial appropriation for the biennium ending June 30, 1941 had reverted to the general revenue fund and consequently there were no funds legally available for its payment.

Evidence proving this claim having been presented to the court, and allowance of the award recommended by respondent, and approved by the attorney general, an award is accordingly made to respondent for the sum of forty-three dollars and thirty-one cents ($43.31).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ct. Cl. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-state-conservation-commission-wvctcl-1943.