Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Nollman
This text of 107 F.2d 176 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Nollman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These two cases present the same questions of fact and law. Appellee, Mrs. R. M. Nollman, was injured by slipping on ice that had formed on the sidewalk in front of appellant’s premises, alleged to have resulted from its negligence.
The only question presented for decision is whether the District Court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence; and, in the alternative, for judgment non-obstante veredicto, or a new trial.
We find substantial evidence in the record tending to support the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 F.2d 176, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-nollman-ca5-1939.