Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ginsburg

209 Ill. App. 308, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 607
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 28, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,461
StatusPublished

This text of 209 Ill. App. 308 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ginsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ginsburg, 209 Ill. App. 308, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 607 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Pleading, § 153*-—when affidavit of merits is insufficient. An affidavit of merits that plaintiff had accepted one of two notes sued on in satisfaction and payment of the other note, with knowledge of the fact that both notes were given to the payee therein mentioned without consideration, was insufficient, even if plaintiff had received the notes with knowledge that they were given as accommodation papers, as knowledge of this fact alone would not defeat the action. 5. Pleading, § 366*—when pleas properly stricken. In an action against the maker of two promissory notes to recover thereon, where an affidavit of merits was properly stricken from the files, held that the pleas, being unsupported, were also properly stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 308, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-ginsburg-illappct-1918.