Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Friedman

Third Circuit

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Friedman

74 F.2d 1013, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4025

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1934

DocketNo. 5488

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.2d 1013 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Friedman, 74 F.2d 1013, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4025 (3d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The subject-matter of this case was whether the appellant had received an unlawful preference over the bankrupt’s other creditors, and the question involved was whether the court erred in refusing to give binding instructions in favor of the appellant, the alleged preferred creditor. The case depends on its own particular facts, and no principles or precedents are in question. Finding no error on the part of the court in refusing appellant’s request for binding instructions in its favor, we limit ourselves to affirming the judgment below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The subject-matter of this case was whether the appellant had received an unlawful preference over the bankrupt’s other creditors, and the question involved was whether the court erred in refusing to give binding instructions in favor of the appellant, the alleged preferred creditor. The case depends on its own particular facts, and no principles or precedents are in question. Finding no error on the part of the court in refusing appellant’s request for binding instructions in its favor, we limit ourselves to affirming the judgment below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.2d 1013, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-friedman-ca3-1934.