Firestein v. Gavlyayev

282 A.D.2d 430, 722 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3327
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 282 A.D.2d 430 (Firestein v. Gavlyayev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Firestein v. Gavlyayev, 282 A.D.2d 430, 722 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Nassau-BOCES appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), dated August 17, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff, a teacher employed in the Bethpage Senior High School, was injured when the defendant, Igor Gavlyayev, collided with her in a hallway. Gavlyayev was a hearing- and visually-impaired student who attended the Nassau-BOCES (hereinafter BOCES) program located in the high school. Liability may not be imposed upon BOCES, a municipal entity, “absent the existence of a special duty together with justifiable reliance thereon by the plaintiff to [his or] her detriment” (Feinsilver v City of New York, 277 AD2d 199; see also, Sampson v Board of Educ., 255 AD2d 434; Johnson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 249 AD2d 370; Bisignano v City of New York, 136 AD2d 671). “The plaintiff’s status as a teacher is insufficient, without more, to create the requisite special duty, as she was in the same position as every other school employee” (Feinsilver v City of New York, supra, at 199; see also, Sampson v Board of Educ., supra; Bisignano v City of New York, supra). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pendulik v. East Hampton Union Free School District
17 A.D.3d 334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Goga v. Binghamton City School District
302 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Reynolds v. Central Islip Union Free School District
300 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
DiCosimo v. Onondaga-Cortland-Madison Board of Cooperative Educational Services
294 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D.2d 430, 722 N.Y.S.2d 589, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestein-v-gavlyayev-nyappdiv-2001.