Firemen's Insurance v. White
This text of 184 S.E. 316 (Firemen's Insurance v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is without merit. Joiner v. Singletary, 106 Ga. 257 (32 S. E. 90). This case differs from Orr v. Webb, 112 Ga. 806 (38 S. E. 98), and Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter, 178 Ga. 258 (173 S. E. 131), in which there was more than one party defendant or plaintiff.
2. In this ease the controlling question is whether, when it appears in an equitable petition brought against an insurer, based on a policy of fire insurance, that the policy involved named two persons as the insured, but the action is brought in the name of only one of the insured, such petition is subject to demurrer for nonjoinder. Under numerous decisions of this court in relation to the subject-matter of fire insurance, all persons interested in the contract should be joined, in order properly to adjudicate the question of liability or non-liability of the insurer. Therefore the court should have sustained the demurrer. The subsequent trial was nugatory.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 S.E. 316, 181 Ga. 759, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firemens-insurance-v-white-ga-1936.