Firemen's Insurance v. Blount

186 S.E. 467, 53 Ga. App. 410, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 136
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Firemen's Insurance v. Blount. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Ga. App. 223
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1936·No. 24906·Published

Opinion

Sutton, J.

The decision of this court appearing in 52 Ga. App. 223 (183 S. E. 111), affirming the judgment overruling- the motion for a new trial of the insurance company, was reversed by the Supreme Court in Firemen’s Insurance Co. v. Blount, 182 Ga. 459 (185 S. E. 717), where it was held that a verdict in favor of the insured was not authorized, because of the failure to file formal written proof of loss, and that the insurer had not waived the submission thereof; this court having held that the insurer had waived the same, in that the insurer and the insured had entered into an agreement, after the fire, fixing and agreeing on the amount of the loss. Applying the ruling- of the Supreme Court, a verdict in favor of the insured was contrary to the law and the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Jenlcins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Firemen's Insurance v. Blount, 186 S.E. 467, 53 Ga. App. 410, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 136 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

186 S.E. 467 (Firemen's Insurance v. Blount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Firemen's Insurance v. Blount
185 S.E. 717 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Firemen's Insurance v. Blount
183 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)