Fire v. Bouquin

58 A.D.2d 1012, 396 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13232

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to petitioner, on the memorandum decision at Trial Term, O’Donnell, J. (See, also, Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. [Stroud], 36 NY2d 719; Alexander v Stone, 45 AD2d [1013]*1013216.) The issue before Stiller, J., when he granted plaintiff’s motion to strike Mattone’s answer for failure to submit to an examination before trial, was not identical to that presented when respondent insurer disclaimed for failure of Mattone, the insured, to co-operate in the defense of the action. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—insurance disclaimer.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Denman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fire v. Bouquin, 58 A.D.2d 1012, 396 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13232 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 1012 (Fire v. Bouquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co.
328 N.E.2d 485 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Alexander v. Stone
45 A.D.2d 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)