Fiquette v. Sanders

62 So. 325, 8 Ala. App. 501, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 215
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

— Whether or not the defendant’s motion to quash the summons in the cause and to set aside the service because of the complaint not having been signed by the plaintiff or her attorney (Code, § 5297) was well taken, all ground of objection on this score was removed by the plaintiff’s amending her complaint by having it signed by her attorney and by the defendant’s taking issue on the complaint. If the court erred in its disposition of the motion, the error was cured by the subsequent proceedings.

There was evidence tending to support the averments of the complaint, as it was amended after the conclusion’of the evidence, and the court properly refused to give the written charges requested by the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fiquette v. Sanders, 62 So. 325, 8 Ala. App. 501, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 215 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

62 So. 325 (Fiquette v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wise v. Johnson
69 So. 986 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)