Fiorese v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fiorese v. Rose

6 A.D.2d 824, 176 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5450

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 1958·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict dismissing the complaint. Appellant was alleged to have been injured when he fell on a pathway on property owned by respondents as a result of respondents’ negligence in having failed to secure a loose stone on the pathway. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No more than a question of fact was presented. It was proper to tax appellant with his inconsistent statements contained in his claim for workmen’s compensation (Nappi v. Falcon Truck Renting Corp., 286 App. Div. 123, affd. 1 N Y 2d 750). Present—Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict dismissing the complaint. Appellant was alleged to have been injured when he fell on a pathway on property owned by respondents as a result of respondents’ negligence in having failed to secure a loose stone on the pathway. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No more than a question of fact was presented. It was proper to tax appellant with his inconsistent statements contained in his claim for workmen’s compensation (Nappi v. Falcon Truck Renting Corp., 286 App. Div. 123, affd. 1 N Y 2d 750). Present—Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Fiorese v. Rose, 6 A.D.2d 824, 176 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

6 A.D.2d 824 (Fiorese v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related