Fiorenti v. Central Emergency Physicians

19 A.D.3d 539, 796 N.Y.S.2d 530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 539 (Fiorenti v. Central Emergency Physicians) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fiorenti v. Central Emergency Physicians, 19 A.D.3d 539, 796 N.Y.S.2d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and violation of the Labor Law, the defendants, Central Emergency Physicians, PLLC, and Theodore F. Packy, M.D., ap- peal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), entered November 5, 2003, as denied their motion, among other things, for leave to renew a prior motion to dismiss the complaint and, upon the resubmission pursuant to CPLR 3222 (b) of the plaintiffs’ cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, found in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant Central Emer- gency Physicians, PLLC, on the issue of liability on the causes of action alleging breach of contract and violation of the Labor Law.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Theodore F. Packy is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Central Emergency Physicians, PLLC, with costs.

The appellant Central Emergency Physicians, PLLC (herein- after the appellant), waived appellate review of the issue of its liability under the Labor Law, since it could have raised the is- sue on a prior appeal (see Fiorenti v Central Emergency Physicians, 305 AD2d 453 [2003]), but elected not to (see EIFS, Inc. v v [540]*540Morie Co., 298 AD2d 551 [2002]; Duffy v Holt-Harris, 260 AD2d 595 [1999]; Matter of Gerzof v Coons, 177 AD2d 487 [1991]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Venigalla v. Nori
41 A.D.3d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Fiorenti v. Central Emergency Physicians, PLLC
39 A.D.3d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 539, 796 N.Y.S.2d 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiorenti-v-central-emergency-physicians-nyappdiv-2005.