Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman)

Nevada Supreme Court

Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman)

DecidedFebruary 16, 2021

Docket82368

StatusPublished

This text of Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman) (Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman), (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GINA FIORE, No. 82368 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILE AND THE HONORABLE CHARLES J. HOSKIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and DOUGLAS BROFMAN, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order reassigning the underlying case to another judicial department. Having considered the petition and the supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); see Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 80, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196-97 (2020) (outlining the conditions requisite for invoking traditional and advisory mandamus). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. Cadish

SUPREME COURT J . OF NEVADA Herndon 10) 1947A eilec• cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge Chesnoff & Schonfeld Douglas Brofrnan Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GINA FIORE, No. 82368 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILE AND THE HONORABLE CHARLES J. HOSKIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and DOUGLAS BROFMAN, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order reassigning the underlying case to another judicial department. Having considered the petition and the supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); see Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev., Adv. Op. 80, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196-97 (2020) (outlining the conditions requisite for invoking traditional and advisory mandamus). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. Cadish

SUPREME COURT J . OF NEVADA Herndon 10) 1947A eilec• cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge Chesnoff & Schonfeld Douglas Brofrnan Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Fiore Vs. Dist. Ct. (Brofman), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiore-vs-dist-ct-brofman-nev-2021.

Opinion

J. Cadish

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack