Fiore v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.

93 A.D.2d 973, 461 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17876

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The action was properly dismissed as time barred, since the summons and complaint, alleging fraud, were served eight years after the commission of the act and two and one-half years after discovery of the alleged fraud. The Statute of Limitations for fraud is six years from the commission of the act, or two years from the actual or imputed discovery of the fraud (CPLR 213, subd 8; 203, subd [f]; Smith v Sarkisian, 63 AD2d 780, affd 47 NY2d 878). Section 2-725 of the Uniform Commercial Code is inapplicable since its provisions cover only causes of action based on breach of contract for sale or breach of warranty. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Provenzano, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fiore v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co., 93 A.D.2d 973, 461 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

93 A.D.2d 973 (Fiore v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Sarkisian
392 N.E.2d 1257 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Smith v. Sarkisian
63 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)