Fiore v. Hecht

New York Court of Appeals

Fiore v. Hecht

274 N.E.2d 443, 29 N.Y.2d 659, 324 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1089

DecidedSeptember 8, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 274 N.E.2d 443 (Fiore v. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fiore v. Hecht, 274 N.E.2d 443, 29 N.Y.2d 659, 324 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1089 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term and the judgment of Supreme Court, Dutchess County, reinstated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Breitel dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the cancellation of the second registration left the respondent Economou without any registration or enrollment outstanding and the subsequent registration would not be effective to reinstate his enrollment until one week after the general election of 1971 under the Election Law. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term and the judgment of Supreme Court, Dutchess County, reinstated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Breitel dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the cancellation of the second registration left the respondent Economou without any registration or enrollment outstanding and the subsequent registration would not be effective to reinstate his enrollment until one week after the general election of 1971 under the Election Law. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 N.E.2d 443, 29 N.Y.2d 659, 324 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiore-v-hecht-ny-1971.