Fiore v. Amoruso

13 A.D.2d 787, 217 N.Y.S.2d 512
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fiore v. Amoruso. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 A.D.2d 637

Opinion

In an action by a vendee for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and to recover damages, and to impress a vendee’s lien upon the property for the amount of such damages, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme [788]*788Court, Westchester County, dated August 5, 1060, which resettled a judgment of the same court, dated June 28, 1960, by eliminating therefrom provisions granting him such a lien. No brief was filed in this court by plaintiff in support of his appeal. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, payable by plaintiff to the intervenors-defendants Ferrino.. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fiore v. Amoruso, 13 A.D.2d 787, 217 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

13 A.D.2d 787 (Fiore v. Amoruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.