Fiorani v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

Fiorani v. Jones

562 F. App'x 178

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2186

StatusPublished

This text of 562 F. App'x 178 (Fiorani v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fiorani v. Jones, 562 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Memorandum of Law to Reverse Debt- or’s Discharge on Fraudulent Petition and all Conduct Thereafter.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Fiora-ni’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fiorani v. Jones, [179]*179No. 4:1 l-cv-00038-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 3, 2013; entered Sept. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Memorandum of Law to Reverse Debt- or’s Discharge on Fraudulent Petition and all Conduct Thereafter.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Fiora-ni’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fiorani v. Jones, [179]*179No. 4:1 l-cv-00038-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 3, 2013; entered Sept. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 F. App'x 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiorani-v-jones-ca4-2014.