Fiochetta, M. v. Fiochetta, M. M.
This text of Fiochetta, M. v. Fiochetta, M. M. (Fiochetta, M. v. Fiochetta, M. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MEGAN MAJCHER FIOCHETTA, : No. 67 WAL 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MATTHEW FIOCHETTA, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the
remaining issue. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court improperly concluded that Father’s child support obligation should include payment for fictional childcare expenses based upon Mother’s deemed earning capacity, when such decision conflicts with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1910.16-6(a) in that the Rule only allows for childcare expenses actually incurred by the other party and does not follow the Superior Court’s prior decision in Portugal v. Portugal, 798 A.2d 246 (Pa. Super. 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fiochetta, M. v. Fiochetta, M. M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiochetta-m-v-fiochetta-m-m-pa-2022.