Finst Development, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums

456 So. 2d 952
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 18, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1894
StatusPublished

This text of 456 So. 2d 952 (Finst Development, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finst Development, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums, 456 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an administrative order which assesses a civil penalty in the amount of $7,500 for violation of laws regulating the sale of condominiums.

A developer of a condominium violates Section 718.502, Florida Statutes (1983),1 where it fails to file with the Division of Florida Land Sales and Condominiums, documents required to be furnished to buyer or lessee by Section 718.503 (disclosure) and Section 718.504 (prospectus or offering circular) prior to an offering. For a violation of the statute, the Division may assess a penalty not to exceed $5,000 pursuant to Section 718.501(l)(d)4.2

Separate offenses are committed under Section 718.502, Florida Statutes (1983) as to each offer of a contract for the purchase of a unit. A contrary interpretation would allow a developer to escape the full impact of the statute by simply adding $5,000, the maximum penalty allowed for a single offense under Section 718.501, to his operating expenses. This was certainly not the intention of the legislature when it enacted Section 718.502.

Since the statute authorizes a civil penalty in the amount of $5,000 for each offense, and the appellant clearly offered a number of contracts for the purchase of units, the $7,500 penalty imposed here is not subject to modification as being excessive. See Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N v. Webb
367 So. 2d 201 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finst-development-inc-v-state-department-of-business-regulation-fladistctapp-1984.