Finocchiaro v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Finocchiaro v. State

447 S.W.3d 221, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1193, 2014 WL 5581017

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2014·No. No. ED 100940·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Nicholas Finocchiaro (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Nicholas Finocchiaro (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Finocchiaro v. State, 447 S.W.3d 221, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1193, 2014 WL 5581017 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

447 S.W.3d 221 (Finocchiaro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.