Finno v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Finno v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

100 So. 3d 1293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20554, 2012 WL 5974103

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 30, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-6208

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 1293 (Finno v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finno v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 100 So. 3d 1293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20554, 2012 WL 5974103 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a final order of the Electrical Contractors’ Licensing Board of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tony Finno, d/b/a True Power Electric, Inc., challenges an order of restitution following a finding by the Board that appellant violated sections 489.533(l)(m)l and 489.533(l)(m)3, Florida Statutes. The Board concedes that restitution was improperly ordered under the specific facts of this case. Accordingly, the final order is reversed insofar as restitution is ordered and the cause is remanded for consideration of an appropriate penalty pursuant to section 120.68(7)(e)4, Florida Statutes.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a final order of the Electrical Contractors’ Licensing Board of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tony Finno, d/b/a True Power Electric, Inc., challenges an order of restitution following a finding by the Board that appellant violated sections 489.533(l)(m)l and 489.533(l)(m)3, Florida Statutes. The Board concedes that restitution was improperly ordered under the specific facts of this case. Accordingly, the final order is reversed insofar as restitution is ordered and the cause is remanded for consideration of an appropriate penalty pursuant to section 120.68(7)(e)4, Florida Statutes.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 3d 1293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20554, 2012 WL 5974103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finno-v-department-of-business-professional-regulation-fladistctapp-2012.