Finnigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society
63 Cal. 390, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 471
Opinion
The respondents’ proposition in this case is, that money earned by a wife may be taken for the debt of her husband. The question is solved by a provision of the Code not referred to by counsel on either side. It is section 168 of the Civil Code, and reads: “ The earnings of the wife are not liable for the debts of the husband.”
That part of the judgment appealed from, together with the order denying the motion for a new trial, reversed, and cause remanded,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finnigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society, 63 Cal. 390, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 471 (Cal. 1883).
63 Cal. 390 (Finnigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Street v. Bertolone
226 P. 913 (California Supreme Court, 1924)
In re Estate of Foster
4 Coffey 33 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1909)