Finnie v. Leblanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Finnie v. Leblanc

841 So. 2d 745, 2003 La. LEXIS 396, 2003 WL 327470

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 10, 2003

DocketNo. 2003-CC-0424

StatusPublished

This text of 841 So. 2d 745 (Finnie v. Leblanc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finnie v. Leblanc, 841 So. 2d 745, 2003 La. LEXIS 396, 2003 WL 327470 (La. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Although relator has been released by motion for partial summary judgment, that judgment is not final and definitive and it remains subject to modification on appeal. Under these circumstances, the trial court did not err in finding relator had “a right related to or connected with the object of the pending action” for purposes of La.Code Civ. P. art. 1091. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court granting relator’s petition of intervention is reinstated.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Although relator has been released by motion for partial summary judgment, that judgment is not final and definitive and it remains subject to modification on appeal. Under these circumstances, the trial court did not err in finding relator had “a right related to or connected with the object of the pending action” for purposes of La.Code Civ. P. art. 1091. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court granting relator’s petition of intervention is reinstated.

REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 So. 2d 745, 2003 La. LEXIS 396, 2003 WL 327470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnie-v-leblanc-la-2003.