Finnican v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
This text of 83 N.Y.S. 1106 (Finnican v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs.
McLennan, WILLIAMS, and NASH, JJ., vote for reversal, upon the ground that it was improper to dispose of the question of pleading involved upon a motion to strike the cause from the calendar, and that the question whether it was necessary for plaintiff to serve a supplemental complaint should have been disposed of upon the trial of the action.
SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ., vote for reversal, with costs, upon the ground that under the circumstances of this case it was not necessary for the plaintiff to serve a supplemental complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnican-v-prudential-ins-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1903.