Finney v. Mayer & Co.
61 Ga. 500
Opinion
By statute, the commencement of suit is the filing of the declaration. There was due service, and’ no further proceedings .took place until after the discharge in bankruptcy was granted. There was full opportunity to plead the discharge before judgment was rendered. There is no legal basis for the affidavit of illegality. It cannot vacate the judgment; most certainly, the judgment is not void, but valid and conclusive.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finney v. Mayer & Co., 61 Ga. 500 (Ga. 1878).
61 Ga. 500 (Finney v. Mayer & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nash Loan Co. v. Yonge
186 S.E. 811 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Edison Provision Co. v. Armour & Co.
179 S.E. 829 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Garner v. Hartsfield Loan & Savings Co.
174 S.E. 647 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Riggs v. Kinney
140 S.E. 41 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Crawford v. Bostwick-Goodell Co.
80 S.E. 1005 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
McDougald v. Chattanooga Medicine Co.
73 S.E. 1089 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Farmers & Traders' Bank v. University Publishing Co.
70 S.E. 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Sosnowski v. Rape
69 Ga. 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1882)