Finney v. Hood

72 Ga. 216
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 24, 1883·Published

Opinion

After a bill of exceptions has been filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court, an acknowledgment of service by defendant in error cannot be endorsed thereon; and the writ will be dismissed, although such entry purports to acknowledge “due and legal service.”

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finney v. Hood, 72 Ga. 216 (Ga. 1883).

72 Ga. 216 (Finney v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.